Folio Reviewer
A review panel that reads your draft before Reviewer 2 does.
Three reviewers with different jobs — one interrogates your methods, one your clarity, one plays the skeptic — read your work and return a structured report you can act on, provenance-stamped so it’s no black box.
Start freeMethods reviewer
Sample size is under-powered for the claimed effect — report a power analysis.
Clarity reviewer
The contribution is strong but buried; lead §1 with it.
Skeptic reviewer
Correlation ≠ causation in §4 — soften or add a control.
The Methods reviewer
Interrogates design, sampling, analysis and threats to validity — the questions a rigorous referee asks first, surfaced while you can still fix them.
The Clarity reviewer
Reads for the argument: is the contribution clear and up front, does the structure carry it, where does a reader get lost? The revisions that get a paper accepted.
The Skeptic
Pushes back the way a hostile reviewer would — overclaims, causal leaps, unaddressed alternatives — so nothing weak reaches submission unnoticed.
A verifiable Reviewer Report
The panel produces a provenance-stamped report at a public link — a record that the review happened and what it said, not an anonymous black-box score.
How it works
Bring your draft
Point Reviewer at a document in Folio. It reads the whole thing in context — your argument, your sources, your claims.
Convene the panel
The Methods, Clarity and Skeptic reviewers each read with their own remit and write structured, specific feedback — not a vague overall grade.
Act, then prove it
Work through the report, then share the provenance-stamped Reviewer Report — a verifiable record that the work was reviewed and revised.
What you get
Questions, answered
Is this a replacement for peer review?
No — it’s the pass before peer review. It catches the methods gaps, unclear arguments and overclaims a referee would flag, so your submission is stronger when a human reviewer sees it.
Why three reviewers instead of one?
Because “give me feedback” produces mush. Splitting the job — methods, clarity, skepticism — gives each reviewer a clear remit, so the critique is specific and actionable instead of generic.
What is the Reviewer Report?
A structured, provenance-stamped record of the review at a public link — so the review is transparent and verifiable, not an anonymous black-box judgment.
Which plan includes Reviewer?
Folio Reviewer is part of the Fellow and Chair plans.
Find the holes before they do.
Run the panel on your draft and fix what a reviewer would catch. Start free.
Free to start · No credit card · Export everything · No ads